Skip to content
Lawwise

      Subjects

      This handbook

      Immigration Sponsorship

      The Audit Notification and the Supervised Recruitment That Can Follow

      The audit letter is a production demand with a short fuse. An employer that assembled its file at filing answers it in an afternoon; an employer that did not is trying to recreate dated evidence that no longer exists, against a deadline that does not move.

      Immigration Sponsorship5 min readFederal lawLabor certification

      A window envelope torn open at one end, lying on a desk beside a folded letter and a plain white mailing label.
      The date on the letter starts a clock that no amount of explanation will move. — The National Archives (United Kingdom), CC BY 3.0, source.

      The rule in short

      An audit notification requires the employer to furnish the documentation supporting the application within a period stated in the letter, with a single extension available on request. A failure to respond results in denial, and the denial is not subject to reconsideration or review. The certifying officer may also require supervised recruitment, in which advertisements are drafted for approval, placed as directed, and applicants are routed to the officer rather than to the employer.

      An audit notification is a production demand. It identifies the documentation the certifying officer requires and states the period within which it must be furnished. The period runs from the date of the letter, one extension may be requested, and a failure to respond in time denies the case without any route of review.

      What brings an audit

      Some audits are random and carry no implication about the file. Others are triggered by something the application itself disclosed. Requirements above the occupational norm, a foreign language demand, a combination of occupations, a familial or ownership relationship between the employer and the worker, and a layoff in the relevant period are the recurring triggers.

      The letter usually reveals which kind it is. A generic audit asks for the standard set. A targeted audit names the specific issue and asks for the documentation addressing it, which tells the employer exactly what the officer is worried about and what the response has to answer.

      The response, and the one extension

      The response must be furnished within the period stated in the letter, measured from its date rather than from receipt. Delivery delays are the employer's problem, which is one reason the correspondence address on the application matters more than it appears to.

      A single extension may be requested, for a limited additional period, and the request must be made within the original window. It is granted or refused at the officer's discretion. There is no second extension, and there is no mechanism for accepting a late filing after the deadline has run.

      The consequence of missing the deadline is severe and unusual: the application is denied, and the denial is not subject to reconsideration or to review. That is a harsher outcome than a denial on the merits, which does carry review rights.

      StageWho actsDeadlineConsequence of default
      Audit notificationEmployer furnishes documentsThe period stated in the letterDenial with no review available
      Extension requestEmployer requests in writingInside the original periodOriginal deadline stands
      Supervised recruitmentEmployer drafts advertisementThe period stated in the directionDenial of the application
      ReconsiderationEmployer requests from the officerA fixed period from the determinationDetermination becomes final
      Board reviewEmployer requests reviewA fixed period from the determinationNo further administrative route

      What the response has to contain

      The standard set is the recruitment record. The signed recruitment report, the tear sheets for both Sunday advertisements, the job order confirmation with its start and end dates, dated evidence of each additional step, the resumes received, and the signed notice of filing showing where and when it was posted. The assembly of that record is set out under the required recruitment steps and the order they must follow.

      Targeted audits add to it. A business necessity audit asks for the justification of every requirement above the occupational norm. A layoff audit asks for the notification and consideration record, treated under layoffs, notification and the duty to consider former workers. A relationship audit asks for evidence that the job opportunity was genuinely open to domestic workers.

      The response cannot improve the recruitment

      An audit tests what was done before filing. Recruitment conducted after the application was submitted is not responsive and does not cure a gap. Employers occasionally place an advertisement in the audit window and include it in the response, which draws attention to the defect rather than repairing it. Where the record has a genuine hole, withdrawing and refiling is usually the better route, and that analysis belongs at the start of the response period, not the end.

      How supervised recruitment runs

      The certifying officer may direct that the employer conduct recruitment under supervision. The employer submits a draft advertisement within the period stated in the direction. The officer approves it, edits it, or instructs the employer to place it in specified publications and in a specified form.

      The distinguishing feature is where applicants go. Under supervision the advertisement directs resumes to the certifying officer rather than to the employer, and the officer forwards them. The employer then files a written recruitment report with the resumes and its lawful job-related reasons for any rejection, within the period the officer sets. Additional recruitment may be ordered on top.

      Supervision may also be imposed on the employer's future applications for a period after a failure to respond to an audit, which makes the missed deadline a structural problem rather than a single lost case. Employers facing a direction of this kind generally bring in labor certification attorney support before drafting the advertisement, because the text is reviewed word by word and a rejected draft costs weeks.

      The routes after a denial

      A denial on the merits may be met with a request for reconsideration to the certifying officer or a request for review by the appellate board, each within a fixed period from the determination. Reconsideration is confined to evidence that was in the file or that the officer should have considered; it is not an opportunity to submit what was left out.

      The board reviews on the record made below, which is the same constraint that governs bid protests and their forums and deadlines in federal contracting. Where the record cannot be repaired, the practical option is to start again, and what a refiling preserves and forfeits is set out under withdrawing and refiling a labor certification.

      Points to carry away

      • An audit may be issued at random or because something on the application invited scrutiny.
      • The response deadline runs from the date of the audit letter and a single extension may be requested.
      • Failing to respond in time results in denial without any right of reconsideration or review.
      • Supervised recruitment may be ordered in place of, or in addition to, an ordinary determination.
      • Under supervision the advertisement text is approved in advance and applicants respond to the certifying officer.
      • A denial on the merits may be challenged by reconsideration and then by the appellate board.

      Questions readers ask

      Is an audit a sign that something is wrong with the case?

      Not necessarily. A share of audits is issued at random, and being selected implies nothing about the application. Others are triggered by features on the form itself: a requirement above the occupational norm, a foreign language demand, a familial relationship between the employer and the worker, or a layoff in the relevant period. An employer can usually tell which kind it received by reading which documents the letter asks for, because a targeted audit names them specifically.

      May the employer submit documents after the deadline passes?

      The regulation treats a failure to furnish the documentation within the period as grounds for denial, and it removes the ordinary routes of reconsideration and review for that failure. Late submission is therefore not a remedy. Where a genuine obstacle exists, the extension should be requested inside the original period rather than explained afterward. An employer that anticipates a document will be slow to arrive should request the extension immediately rather than wait to see.

      How long does supervised recruitment take?

      Longer than ordinary recruitment, because each stage waits on the certifying officer. The employer drafts an advertisement, submits it, waits for approval or direction, places it as instructed, waits for the response period to close, then files a recruitment report with the resumes attached. Additional recruitment may then be ordered. Employers should assume the process adds months to the case and should plan the wage determination and any status extensions around that.

      Sources

      1. eCFR — 20 CFR 656.20, Audit proceduresThe audit notification, the response period, the extension and the consequence of a failure.
      2. eCFR — 20 CFR 656.21, Supervised recruitmentThe advertisement approval process, the routing of applicants and the recruitment report.
      3. eCFR — 20 CFR 656.24, Labor certification determinationsHow the certifying officer decides and what a determination must state.
      4. eCFR — 20 CFR 656.26, AppealsThe request for review, the deadline and the record on which the board decides.
      5. eCFR — 20 CFR 656.17, Basic labor certification processThe recruitment documentation an audit calls for.
      6. Foreign Labor Application Gateway — Permanent labor certification programThe filing system through which audit responses and case correspondence move.

      Lawwise is a publication, not a law firm. This article states general rules and cites its sources; it is not advice about any particular case, and the law differs by state and changes over time.

      More in Immigration Sponsorship

      Immigration Sponsorship

      Withdrawing and Refiling a Labor Certification

      Requests to modify an Application for Permanent Employment Certification are not accepted once it is filed. An employer that needs a different job title, wage, worksite or requirement must withdraw and refile. Withdrawal does not erase an audit notification already issued, does not preserve the priority date, and does not extend the validity of recruitment beyond the windows the regulation sets. The refiled case is new in every respect except the retention duty, which attaches to both.

      6 min readFederal law

      Immigration Sponsorship

      Tentative Nonconfirmations and the Right to Contest

      When an electronic verification case returns a mismatch, the employer notifies the employee privately, provides the written further action notice, and lets the employee decide whether to contest. If the employee contests, the employer refers the case and hands over the confirmation stating the employee's deadline. Throughout, the employer may not terminate, suspend, reduce hours, withhold pay or training, or delay a start date. Only a final nonconfirmation permits action.

      5 min readFederal law

      Immigration Sponsorship

      Successor Employers and the Records They Inherit

      A buyer acquiring a workforce chooses between adopting the seller's employment verification forms and completing new ones, and adopting them means inheriting their defects. Wage attestations pass to a successor only where it assumes the predecessor's obligations in a sworn statement placed in each public access file. An approved labor certification and its priority date may follow a successor that assumed the predecessor's rights and assets. Program enrollment does not transfer to a new entity.

      6 min readFederal law